Split a security deposit refund by what each person actually paid in: the refund waterfall, move-in photos that cut a deduction, and solo damage charged solo.
The Deduction List On The Last Day
On the last day of the Gulberg lease, the landlord walked the flat with a notebook and the air of a man reading out exam results. The list grew as the walk went on: marks on the lounge walls, a scuffed door frame, a cracked window latch in the middle bedroom. At the bottom he wrote the figure the whole performance had been aiming at. Painting, full flat: 18,000, to come out of the 120,000 security deposit before any refund reached the house.
Two problems sat inside that one line. The smaller problem was the money. The larger one was that most of those wall marks had been on the walls the day the house moved in, and everyone in the room knew it, and knowing a thing and proving it on the last day of a lease are very different sports. The refund fight that tenants fear is rarely about the landlord, though. It starts later, at the kitchen table, when the refund that survives has to be divided among people who no longer agree on what fair means.
The Refund Split Starts On Move-In Day
The split that saved that evening had been decided two years earlier, by accident of cash flow. The deposit on the flat was 120,000, two months of the 60,000 rent that the house divided with the rent split calculator, which is the usual deposit scale in Punjab: as a law firm's guide to the Punjab Rented Premises Act 2009 sets out, a landlord may take a security deposit commonly equal to one or two months of rent, and disputes that talk cannot settle can go to the Rent Tribunal.
In move-in month, the other two were short, so I fronted half the deposit myself and the screenshot of the transfer went into the group chat with the rent receipt.
Person
Paid toward the deposit
Share of the deposit
Me
60,000
50 percent
Flatmate 2
30,000
25 percent
Flatmate 3
30,000
25 percent
Total
120,000
100 percent
That screenshot fixed the rule the refund would later follow: the deposit comes back in the proportions it went in. Not equal thirds, because the contributions were not equal. Not rent proportions either, because the deposit is not rent; it is a stake each person holds in the condition of the flat. I had never thought of the fronted 60,000 as a policy. It became one the day the landlord opened his notebook, because a contribution record that nobody can argue with turns the refund division into arithmetic.
The Refund Waterfall, Step By Step
Take the deduction list item by item. Never accept or reject the landlord's total as a single figure. Each line gets its own yes, no, or argument.
Separate the deductions into shared and solo. General wear and shared-area items are shared. Damage inside one person's room, caused by that person, is solo.
Challenge each line with the move-in evidence before agreeing any figure (the next section shows what that evidence did).
Take shared deductions off the refund in contribution proportions. A 5,000 shared deduction comes 2,500 off a 50 percent stake and 1,250 off each 25 percent stake.
Take solo deductions off that person's refund only.
Pay out the resulting refunds and screenshot the finished table into the group chat, so the division exists outside anyone's memory.
Waterfall line
Amount
Me
Flatmate 2
Flatmate 3
Deposit paid in
120,000
60,000
30,000
30,000
Painting deduction, agreed after photos (shared)
-5,000
-2,500
-1,250
-1,250
Cracked window latch, middle bedroom (solo)
-3,000
0
-3,000
0
Refund paid out
112,000
57,500
25,750
28,750
Deposit contributions against refunds, Gulberg lease
Data: the Gulberg lease, deposit 120,000, agreed deductions 8,000, refund 112,000 split by contribution.
One boundary matters enough to state plainly: the final month's rent is settled on its own, by the day count if somebody leaves mid-month, which is the subject of the guide on Prorated Rent For A Mid-Month Move. Quietly netting rent out of a deposit refund, without a written line both sides agree to, is how two settled questions turn into one unsettled argument.
What The Boring Photos Did
On move-in day, while the others were arguing about which room got the good mattress, I walked the empty flat with my phone and photographed every wall, the kitchen tiles, the bathroom fittings and the window latches. Then I sent the whole set into the group chat that evening. The photos were not taken out of wisdom. They were taken because the landlord had mentioned painting during the viewing, and I wanted a record before the furniture hid the walls.
Two years later, those photos did the talking in the deduction conversation. The lounge marks the landlord priced at 18,000 sat in the move-in set, timestamped, in a chat thread he could scroll himself. The claim settled at 5,000 for the scuffs that were genuinely new, most of them around the door frame the house had used hardest.
Tenant guidance recommends exactly this record: LegalClarity's roommate rent guide advises photographing the condition of the place at move-in and again at move-out, with damage in a specific room charged to that room's share and shared-area damage divided the way the rent is divided.
The move-in photos were boring on the day I took them. Two years later they were worth 13,000.
The lesson I took is not that landlords are dishonest. The landlord in that walk accepted the photos without a fight once the evidence existed. The lesson is that memory is the weakest currency in a deposit dispute, and a timestamped photograph is the strongest one a tenant can hold for free.
When One Person Leaves Before The Lease Ends
A mid-lease exit runs into a structural fact: the landlord holds one deposit for the flat, and landlords generally return it once, at the end of the whole lease, after the last tenant has left and the place has been inspected. The departing person cannot collect a stake from the landlord in month eight of a twelve-month lease, however clean the room gets left.
The working fixes are internal, and both are simple transfers between people rather than claims on the landlord.
The replacement buys the stake. The incoming tenant pays the departing tenant's deposit contribution directly, and steps into that stake for the eventual refund. This was the cleanest version in practice, because no money waits on a lease that still has months to run.
The remaining tenants buy the stake. The refund proportions then get rewritten in the house note the same day, so the final waterfall already knows the new owners.
Either way, the transfer goes in writing. Amount, date, and the stake it buys, in the same note the house uses for monthly settlement. The note the Gulberg house kept already carried a deposit line per person, the system described in the guide on The Monthly Settlement System, so a stake changing hands was a one-line edit rather than a reconstructed memory.
The Deposit Rules I Keep
Photograph everything on move-in day and share the set with the whole house the same day, so the timestamps live in more than one phone.
Write down who paid what toward the deposit, on day one. Contributions, not intentions.
Split shared deductions by contribution ratio. Split solo damage onto the person whose room it happened in.
Never split a refund equally when the contributions were not equal. Equal is a method, not a default, and it is the wrong method here.
Settle the last rent separately from the deposit. Two pots, two calculations, two written lines.
None of this requires a lawyer or a suspicious temperament. It requires one afternoon of boring documentation at the start of a lease and one honest table at the end of it. The move-out fight people dread is almost always lost or won on move-in day, long before anyone knows a fight is coming.
Questions People Ask About This Page
Should A Deposit Refund Be Split Equally Or By What Each Person Paid?
In the same proportions as the contributions, not in equal shares and not in rent proportions. If one person fronted half of a 120,000 deposit, half of every shared deduction and half of the refund belong to that person.
What Happens To The Deposit When One Roommate Leaves Mid-Lease?
The landlord normally returns one payment at the end of the whole lease, after everyone has left and the place has been inspected. The practical fix is internal: the incoming tenant pays the departing tenant's deposit stake directly, or the remaining tenants buy the stake out, and the transfer gets written down.
Who Pays For Damage Found In One Person's Room?
Only the damage that person actually caused. A broken latch in one bedroom comes out of that bedroom's occupant alone, while general wear and shared-area items divide across the whole house by contribution ratio.
What Evidence Settles A Disputed Deduction?
Timestamped photos taken on move-in day and shared with the house the same day. In the case in this guide they cut a landlord's painting deduction from 18,000 to 5,000 in a single conversation, because the marks in the photos predated the tenancy.
Facts, Checked Against Trusted Sources
Under the Punjab Rented Premises Act 2009, a landlord may take a security deposit, commonly equal to one or two months of rent, to cover damage or unpaid rent, and rental disputes that cannot be settled by discussion can be taken to the Rent Tribunal. Source: ASR Law Associates, Punjab Rented Premises Act 2009 rights guide
Tenant guidance recommends photographing the condition of the unit at move-in and again at move-out: damage inside one person's room should come out of that person's deposit share, while damage in shared areas is split the same way the rent is split. Source: LegalClarity, how to split rent between roommates fairly
Leave A Comment